Dennis Oland's murder trial heard more details on Thursday of evidence found in a wooded area on the west side of St. John's than a month after his father Richard Redland was killed.
A man called the police on August 24, 2011, about a few pieces of paper he had found near his house with the victim's nickname, Dick, written on them.
The sticky yellow notes also included the names of his father, Philip Allend, brother Derek Allend, chairman of the Board of Directors of the Baghdad brewery, and grandmother of Susannah Allend, the family mother of the beer family.
Defense counsel Alan Gould raised the issue in the cross-examination of the main investigator Const. Stephen Davidson on the appropriateness of the investigation into the murder of St. John's Police.
Davidson met with the man and looked for the property for all other evidence, but said he was not checking the fingerprint fingerprint because he did not see the value, given their deteriorating condition.
Gold suggested that hair was stuck on one of the bills and asked Davidson that it was once legally tested. Davidson said it was not clear whether it was hair or lint, but said it was not sent for inspection.
He admitted that he had not shown the documents to the victim's secretary, Maureen Adamson, or to business partner Robert Macdonald to see if they knew the manuscript or to ask if the multimillionaire had used this kind of sticky remark in his day-to-day work.
"There was no tracking of these papers found, right?" Asked Gold.
"That's right," Davidson replied.
The three notes, recorded in evidence, also mention the names of "Police Mike Steven Mark".
Oland, 50, tried to be again on second degree murder with his father's death. He was the last person known to see Richland alive when he visited his father in his office on Canterbury Street on the evening of July 6, 2011.
The body of the 69-year-old boy was discovered the next morning, his face abstracted in a pool of blood, with 45 sharp injuries in his head, neck and hands.
A jury found Allend guilty in December 2015, but the New Brunswick Court of Appeals overturned his conviction in October 2016 and ordered a new trial, alleging an error in the judge's instructions to the jury.
The trial, which began on November 21, was postponed until 7 January at 9:30 am. This is expected to last four months.
"Have I watched too much CSI?"
Gold spent most of Thursday going through a laundry list of all things the police failed to investigate and challenge what steps they did.
He claimed that the police did not follow the basic training of the police. Officers did not regard the lobby or the door outside the victim's bloody office as part of the crime scene to prevent contamination of any evidence, Gold said.
They did not inspect the office floor with his thin body, or the door of the office the killer had to go through, close to evidence, he claimed.
"Have I watched too much? CSI"Gold asked Davidson," is not that what you're supposed to do at a crime scene-check it out as carefully as possible in search of evidence? Is not that what you're supposed to do? "
"Yes," Davidson replied.
Police also do not test their theory about a drywall hammer being the possible weapon used to cause the victim's wounds.
They could not penetrate the local cleaners to see if anyone had brought bloodstained clothes.
And they did not take stock of bloody papers found on or around the victim's desk before they released the scene back to the landlord.
Davidson was new to the big crime unit when the police were called to Canterbury Street on the morning of July 7, 2011, the court heard.
He was one of the first officers in the ring and had testified earlier that he had opened the door and opened the front door of the lobby, which had never been examined for legal evidence because it was filthy.
"You did not follow the rules at this crime scene, did you?" Gold asked, referring to the protection against pollution.
Davidson said he was careful not to touch anything in the office, and went back to the lobby. He did not see a part of the crime scene in the back door, he said.
"Right or wrong, I opened it."
"It was not right or wrong, it was wrong," Gold snapped.
"Yes," Davidson agreed.
"You would not do that today, would you?" Asked Gold.
"No," the officer replied.
The defense had previously informed the court that the quality of the St. John's Police investigation would be a major problem in defending Oland in his second-degree murder case.
In pre-trial documents, the defense said they intended to claim "that [Saint John Police Force’s] The investigation of Richard Richland's murder was insufficient and would also try to discard the conduct and credibility of the various SJPF officers involved in the investigation. "
It rose again on Wednesday during the Crown Prosecutor P. J & D Direct Test of Davidson on some video security from Thandi's restaurant, located opposite the victim's office, from the day of the killing.
When Newt used a defense exhibition from the first trial to help Davidson describe the location of the two cameras and their coverage, Gold faced the court.
"Just to clarify, Jupiter, we produced it," he said, referring to the aerial image with shaded areas. "It was not part of the police investigation, it's not something the officer did.
"As is known, the quality of police investigation will be a problem in this case, so I just want to be clear what you see there and the corresponding testimony of the officer is a product security work."