Thursday , October 21 2021

The lawsuit against the bank for a refund of $ 1.6 million.



[ad_1]

Sign up for a free account.

The young woman sued the West Bank. Alleged violation of the recovery agreement over 1.6 million plaintiff sued the victim is a customer of several banks. Later, the prosecutor was an angry call center out to ask for Internet banking through the application on the smartphone of the villains. Then withdraw money more than 1.6 million within 8 days without warning the bank. Do not check unusual money transfers. A civil suit sued the two defendants with 7.5 percent interest per year.

The young woman sued the Civil Bank and called for the money to be sent to the call center. Revealed at the Civil Court Road Ratchadaphisek on 15 November, Thitima Jirapanich, 37, advertising model. Siam Commercial Bank PCL (SCB) and Siam Commercial Bank Asset Management (SCB) are plaintiffs who have not complied with the terms of the agreement. The indictment states that on August 15, 2006, the plaintiff opened a savings account with the defendant at the Akamay branch and opened the Easy Easy card. On June 26, 2007, the plaintiff opened a single trading service. SCB Investor opened with 2 defendants in Meng Jai Branch then, on September 14, 2014, and the bond fund with defendant 2 at the Central Level 9 branch on June 29, 2559 opened a savings account with the defendant in Big C – Ratchada. , The defendant is a professional deposit service, pension for financial transactions through Internet banking or ECE or Easy Net.Guaranteed secure security, data access control.User authentication service to comply with the law and notification of the Bank of Thailand, but the defendant ignored it. damage.

In December 2560 was a criminal center. Scams remove the plaintiff's information, for example. Identity Card Number OTPP ATMs then request online banking through the application on the villain's smartphone. Entering a financial transaction with the defendant by the ECC channel. The plaintiff's money was transferred several times within 8 days, from December 27, 2017 to January 4, 2018. The amount of money from 10,000 baht to 373,000 baht per account of the criminal group through. Names of people open to the provinces. The transfer of funds is not normal. The defendant did not notice a warning, but later learned to repair the Internet banking system.

Action of the defendant as a depositor, there is a reward. Be sure to monitor data access. I have not used enough. Use less caution than other depositors. The defendant is responsible for the amount of 1,670,200 baht of the plaintiff lost interest rate with 7.5 percent per year. The total amount is 1,780,830 Baht. The regular court mediated on 16 February 62 at 09:00.

It's a good thing. This has happened since the end of last year. I was called to the call center. I was put on trial to buy land. AP Kiri Khan First, pretends to be a financial transaction and ask for a verification code to access the banking application. After that, know it. The money deposited in the bank was transferred several times. When asked to return the bank does not show any responsibility. So go to court today as a public user. I want the bank has a standard way. Especially if it is. Exceptional transactions should be instructed or checked with the account holder to avoid damage. Each time you log in to the transaction. There should be a message or email to the account owner, but this case does not do anything.I need to check my account to know how much money to lose.

[ad_2]
Source link